Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Internalize ProductHeaderValue #406

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 28, 2014

Conversation

trsneed
Copy link
Contributor

@trsneed trsneed commented Feb 28, 2014

What Haacked, PaulBetts, and Shiftkey suggested. Abstracted ProductHeaderValue, changed tests to use internal ProductHeaderValue.

Also, removed some unused usings in the tests if I saw them.

What Haacked, PaulBetts, and Shiftkey suggested
{
ProductHeaderValue()
{

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove the newline.

@trsneed
Copy link
Contributor Author

trsneed commented Feb 28, 2014

Think I got it all, apologies. I will update my resharper to match your style.

@haacked
Copy link
Contributor

haacked commented Feb 28, 2014

Also, it looks like you created this off an old master branch. Please fetch and merge origin/master into your branch. Or rebase your branch off origin/master. Either way.

@trsneed
Copy link
Contributor Author

trsneed commented Feb 28, 2014

I think I got it right (let me know if I didnt), through powershell and the Github for Windows app. Gave me a much deeper understanding of git. 👍

@haacked
Copy link
Contributor

haacked commented Feb 28, 2014

Great stuff! I'm going to run our build server against it and then I'll merge it once it passes.

haacked added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2014
@haacked haacked merged commit 9409429 into octokit:master Feb 28, 2014
@haacked
Copy link
Contributor

haacked commented Feb 28, 2014

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants